DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JET
Docket No. 4611-12
26 Nov 12
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 26 November 2012. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 1 Jun
12, a copy of which is attached.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
errer OF injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an afticiad
Docket No. 4611-12
s on the applicant to demonstrate the
burden i
justice.
naval record, the
ble material error or in
existence of proba
Sincerely,
paviYD//dJ. CASH
Hea Pay Section
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04611-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2009. On 25 August 2008, NAVADMIN 235/08 was published announcing that all reserve members thereafter mobilized in support of GWOT assignments would be issued orders under 10 USC 12302. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04611-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04611-04
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 March 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04611-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to aS Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she reenlisted USNR vice USN. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 July 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04611-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to enlistment in a higher paygrade.. 2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Milner, Ms. McCormick, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04753 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04260 12
4260-12 26 Nov 12 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04301 12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 1560 MFR-1 undtd, a COpy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04603 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06025 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 October 2012. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/232 dated 26 June 2012, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.